Enabling Communication for Adolescents & Adults with Autism spectrum disorder and associated intellectual deficiency.
Ma Voix is a digital communication tool designed for non-verbal adolescents and adults with autism and associated severe intellectual disability.
The project was part of the Connect research initiative led by Roberto Toro’s lab at the Institut Pasteur.
It was developed for the Institut Médico-Éducatif (IME) Cour de Venise, Paris, which hosts 25 students aged 16–21 with moderate to severe autism and very different communication skills.
At IME:
Through immersive user research and collaborative co-design, I partnered with speech analysts and educators to define and address the core challenges faced by non-verbal users. The result was a well-researched MVP that streamlined communication through a redesigned AAC tool, informed by direct user feedback and expert validation. This work led to a new interface with features like cloud sync and a timetable module, ready for development.
UX Phase | Key Action | Collaborators | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Discovery | Observed IME for 11 days using a Designer’s Notebook to record interactions, tasks, and frustrations (e.g., “I want cheese” request). | Speech analysts, educators | Mapped real communication flows. Identified task breakdowns and pain points in physical tool preparation. |
Ran Hierarchical Task Analysis to break down complex student–educator interactions. | Speech analysts, educators | Clarified multi-step tasks. Revealed opportunities where digital tools could reduce effort. | |
Created typological datasheets on cognitive, behavioural, and language profiles; validated with key staff. | 2 Speech analysts | Defined primary design group: non-verbal users able to request via pictograms. | |
Definition | Developed 4 personas (3 ASD adolescents, 1 speech analyst/educator) and job stories. | Speech analysts | Anchored design decisions to specific user needs and contexts. |
Benchmarked leading AAC* tools and assistive tech to assess strengths, gaps, and opportunities. | Speech analysts, educators | Identified strengths of PECS and gaps in navigation, onboarding, and language. | |
Testing | Designed special protocol with paired-choice preference assessment**, mediated by speech analysts. | 4 adolescents/adults with ASD, 5 educators | Found navigation gaps, motor-skill barriers, and unclear visual cues guiding UI changes. |
Definition → Ideation | Mapped As-Is and Future user flows for ASD personas and educators. | Speech analysts, educators | Highlighted pain points and redesign opportunities. |
Ideation | Led 2-day remote co-design workshop (Miro, Google Meet) using HMW, Crazy 8, concept sketching, and voting. | 2 Speech analysts, 2 educators | Defined split interface (user/caregiver), cloud sync, timetable module, and pictogram search. |
Delivery (UI Design) | Designed pictogram library management (multi-tagging, personal pictos), timetable module, and large tap targets. | 2 Front-end developers, 2 neuroscientists | Delivered interfaces ready for MVP development. |
*AAC tools: Augmentative and Alternative Communication systems for non-verbal communication.
**Paired-choice preference assessment: Method to identify a user’s preferred items by offering two choices at a time.
A lightweight observation framework that captures the complete story of educator - student interactions - from digital tools to body language - delivering rich, actionable insights at speed.
Designed to decode complex multi-party classroom dynamics, this instrument goes beyond surface behaviors to uncover the why behind every action. The standardized approach accelerated analysis while preserving critical contextual details, directly feeding personas, user flows, and strategic design decisions.
Custom observation notebook used in situ at IME.
What it is
What it captures
Why it worked
Impact on the project
HTA context
ex) Extract from a passage from the “Designer notebook”
Built data-driven student profiles with speech analysts, transformed them into personas, and translated insights into design requirements—ensuring accessible requests, tailored speech synthesis, intuitive navigation, and familiar pictograms.
Typology datasheets mapping language, motor, and cognitive abilities,validated with speech analysts.
Personas representing main usage scenarios.
Description:
Design requirements:
Field observations revealed how switching between paper cards and iPad apps fragmented communication flow for adolescents with ASD—leading to a unified platform design that eliminated cognitive friction.
By documenting the real-world disruptions caused by format switching, this research uncovered a critical usability barrier. The insights directly shaped platform requirements that seamlessly integrated student and therapist needs, creating one cohesive communication environment.
Description:
Design requirements derived from this research:
Frequent loss and reprinting of physical pictograms wasted educators’ time, driving the need for a digital system that enables quick creation, replacement, and instant retrieval.
Description:
Design requirements derived from this research:
User testing showed major usability barriers—small tap targets, hidden key actions, and poor hierarchy—slowing adoption; clearer navigation, larger targets, and prioritizing essentials like the “I want” pictogram are required for independent use.
Description:
Design requirements derived from this research:
Educators noted that local-only storage meant all settings were lost if a tablet broke, forcing full reconfiguration; preserving profiles independently of devices and enabling anytime, cross-device access is needed to prevent communication disruption.
Description:
Design requirements derived from this research:
Simplified UI with larger tap targets, clear tab categories, personal pictograms, and profile-based speech synthesis enabled adolescents with diverse abilities to make independent requests and progressively build communication skills.
Solutions implemented:
Outcome:
Enabled adolescents with varying cognitive, motor, and language abilities to use the tool independently, make requests without assistance, and gradually expand their communication skills.
As-Is user flow observed at IME.
The solution centered on simplifying access to pictograms and reducing fragmentation across tools. By integrating open-source pictogram libraries and combining both communication and support aids within one application, the design provided a consistent, single digital environment.
Solutions implemented:
Outcome:
Both the care giver and the student have access to pictogrammes from their personal library and a huge open source library - ARASAAC , with more than 35000 pictogrammes.
Managing pictograms was a constant challenge for the IME: assets were scattered, updates required manual reprinting, and personalization was slow. To address this, we designed a centralized digital library that organizes, personalizes, and retrieves pictograms instantly, ensuring they remain the living core of both daily communication and institutional support.
Solutions implemented:
Outcome:
The pictograms are the central elements of the system and of the IME. They are either chosen from an image bank (such as ARASAAC, Pyramid PECS) or they are personalised.
During testing, users struggled with small touch targets, unclear navigation, and hidden actions that slowed adoption. The redesign focused on improving accessibility and visual clarity, making the interface more intuitive and reducing reliance on caregiver guidance.
Post two rounds of user testing
Old Screen | New Screen |
---|---|
Tabs were too narrow, making selection difficult for users with limited motor skills. | Tabs widened and color-coded, improving hit area and visual differentiation between themes. |
“Start the sentence” was visually indistinguishable from other tabs. | “Start the sentence” emphasized with spacing and color hierarchy, reinforcing its foundational role. |
Play and Clear buttons looked identical (same size, stacked), causing accidental deletions. | Play button enlarged, visually differentiated from Clear, and given higher contrast to reduce errors. |
Pictograms were mixed together without categorization. | Pictograms structured by category (e.g., caregiver names, “I want”), enabling quick retrieval and encouraging use. |
No affordance indicated that a sentence strip should be built at the bottom; pictograms were simply draggable. | A dedicated sentence-building zone with dotted guides and hover feedback signaled placement, strengthening affordance. |
One of the main pain points uncovered was the fragility of local storage: if a tablet broke, all customizations and pictogram setups were lost. The solution focused on ensuring continuity and stability by introducing cloud synchronization and separating caregiver and user environments, so communication could remain uninterrupted while settings were managed in the background.
Solutions implemented:
Outcome:
Future user flow for the caregivers.
Intro:
Caroline (Persona 4) - speech therapist/educator
Caroline has just entered the office in the morning. She decides to create a new tab on her PC and place appropriate pictograms so that Jeremy (Persona 1) can use his tablet in the canteen during lunch.